Blogbook -- The Circular Logic of Standardized English
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgCb6PsqohVkcEjQcGfREmt91t1Vl3yn2GYGGtVj-9r5V3OmzoTOigT_ep1a3rQrht7EgV9JOkcIud1Zx4AffJoBdcd4yXbDhETY62F5P_MRDDZT3SjtjPVFtmHEi-BbJ0YVtP0Q96rlzI/s16000/hands.jpeg)
Entry 35 In posts 30 , 32 , 33 , and 34 , I discussed the CCSS L.11-12.1 anchor standard and the first of the standards underneath it (L.11-12.1.A). Now, consider the second standard, L.11-12.1.B. It is equally problematic as the first. And it works to maintain the white language supremacy, or a single standard that is dominant in all schools and colleges. It also exemplifies a problem that such standards tend to have when used in classrooms. It’s a problem of circularity, of being one’s own judge. L.11-12.1.B states, “Resolve issues of complex or contested usage, consulting references (e.g., Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage , Garner's Modern American Usage ) as needed.” This standard reinforces white habits of English language in classrooms by using as a yardstick the very standard being contested. So according to this standard, the way you resolve a contested usage is to consult references that point back to the standard. Do you see the problem? This is overdet